What? Has the International Libertarian
gone crazy? No, here's the story. Michael Lind published a couple of
articles trying desperately to discredit libertarianism. (See
The
Question Libertarians Just Can’t Answer and
Grow
Up, Libertarians) He thinks that his question addressed to
libertarians, “If your approach is so great, why hasn’t any
country anywhere in the world ever tried it?” is just devastating.
Jacob Hornberger compiled a list of libertarian responses and wrote a
good answer of his own in his blog entry
A
Response to Michael Lind.
Here is the devastating response. When
Mr. Lind asks about a country he is talking about a nation-state with
a government. That means all the corruption and violence that
governments bring with them. That is what is at the heart of the
matter.
|
A shirt worn by a protester illegally selling raw milk and lemonade. Is this what makes libertarianism so bad to Mr. Lind? |
Could the financial institutions enjoy
their cartel status without the government created Federal Reserve
System? No, of course not.
Could the defense contractors enjoy
their gravy train without all that government spending and
warmongering? No, so libertarianism isn't for them.
Could the law enforcement and legal
establishments continue to prosper without the government's war on
drugs. No, true liberty would be very bad for them.
Could the people that want to live off
of the welfare state continue to do so without the government's
largess? No, libertarianism would mean real work instead.
Could the education establishment
continue to live high on the hog without the government pouring money
into its coffers? No, obviously not.
There you have it, libertarianism
really doesn't work for the special interests that want to use
government force to enrich themselves at others expense. It also
doesn't work for the politicians who want to cater to these special
interests. They can't do any of this in a free market. That's why Mr.
Lind is right, since libertarianism doesn't work for all of these
entrenched interests they make sure there isn't a libertarian country
around. Thomas Paine summed it up in his book
The
Rights of Man:
…the
portion of liberty enjoyed in England is just enough to enslave a
country more productively than by despotism, and that as the real
object of all despotism is revenue, a government so formed obtains
more than it could do either by direct despotism, or in a full state
of freedom, and is, therefore on the ground of interest, opposed to
both.
Instead of getting upset libertarians
should thank Mr. Lind for his articles. No longer can statists claim
that our present (and many) problems are due to some libertarian free
market. Mr. Lind establishes very clearly that there is none anywhere
in the world. The blame must lie elsewhere. Perhaps in the mixed
economy he so loves? It looks like that is what has failed those of
us not living off of the government's profligacy. Hmm...that
libertarian society just keeps looking better all the time! Thank
you, Mr. Lind.